Interactive Pedagogical Strategies for Enhancing Student Engagement in Online Christian Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22729945Keywords:
Interactive Pedagogy, Student Engagement, Community of Inquiry, Online Christian Higher EducationAbstract
Student engagement is a crucial concern in Online Christian Higher Education (OCHE), where learning is expected to be both academically rigorous and formational. While interactive pedagogical strategies are widely recognised as critical to effective online learning, existing engagement frameworks often remain religiously neutral and insufficiently attentive to the distinctive aims of Christian education. This conceptual paper examines how interactive pedagogical strategies can enhance student engagement in OCHE through the lens of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. The paper conceptualises student engagement as a multidimensional construct encompassing behavioural, cognitive, emotional and spiritual engagement. The paper develops an integrated conceptual model that positions teaching, social, and cognitive presence as pedagogical conditions through which holistic engagement occurs. Selected interactive pedagogical strategies (including discussion-based learning, collaborative learning, case-based learning, and technology-mediated approaches) are analysed in relation to this model. The paper further discusses pedagogical implications for course design, instructional practice, curriculum coherence, and faculty development. By situating interactive pedagogy within both established online learning theory and Christian educational commitments, the paper contributes a theoretically grounded model to guide teaching practice and future research in online Christian higher education.
References
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a Community of Inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 3-22.
Barnett-Itzhaki, Z., Beimel, D., & Tsoury, A. (2023). Using a variety of interactive learning methods to improve learning effectiveness: Insights from AI models based on teaching surveys. Online Learning Journal, 27(3), 363-386.
Budhai, S. S., & Skipwith, K. B. (2022). Best practices in engaging online learners through active and experiential learning strategies (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Cummings, C., Shelton, K., Mason, D., & Baur, K. (2015). Active learning strategies for online and blended learning environments. In J. Keengwe & J. J. Agamba (Eds.), Models for improving and optimizing online and blended (pp. 58-82). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.
Cunningham, A. (2019). Envisioning Christian presence and practice in online teaching contexts. International Journal of Christianity and English Language Teaching, 6, 3-19.
Fiock, H. S. (2020). Designing a Community of Inquiry in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 134-152.
Hisham, A. N., Sailun, A. S., & Mohamed, S. (2021). Student engagement level in online learning: The new normal. Selangor Humaniora Review, 4(1), 278-290.
Hoidn, S., & Reusse, K. (2021). Foundations of student-centered learning and teaching. In S. Hoidn & M. Klemencic (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (pp. 17-46). New York: Routledge.
Khodabandelou, R., Asadi, M. R., Ghasemi, M., & Amerian, M. (2024). More than two decades of Community of Inquiry research: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 0, 1-28. doi:10.1177/20427530241239418
Kim, V. H. (2024). Integration of faith and learning in online programs: A case study of online curriculum at a Christian university. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning for Christians in Higher Education, 14(1), 31-53.
Lewis, D. E., Nelson, T. R., & Viana, H. H. (2022). The integration of spiritual formation through distance education for Christian higher education students. Journal of Biblical Perspectives in Leadership, 12(2), 100-119.
Lim, J. (2017, October 18). The Community of Inquiry framework in practice. Retrieved from: https://blog.janinelim.com/the-community-of-inquiry-framework-in-practice/
Lowe, S. D., & Lowe, M. E. (2018). Ecologies of faith in a digital age: Spiritual growth through online education. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Lumingkewas, E. M., & Kasingku, J. D. (2025). Cultivating Student Engagement In Christian Religious Education: A Qualitative Literature Review. Journal of Education Research and Review, 41-53. doi:10.59397/edu.v4i1.125
Meng, W., Yu, L., Liu, C., Pan, N., Pang, X., & Zhu, Y. (2024). A systematic review of the effectiveness of online learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Frontiers in Education, 8(1334153), 1-14. doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1334153
Moore, T. (2022). Flipping Composition Instruction: Amplifying Flexibility, Increasing Delight. In L. Gray-Rosendale & S. Rosendale (Eds.), Go Online! Reconfiguring Writing Courses for the New, Virtual World (pp. 57-70). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Nilson, L. B., & Goodson, L. A. (2021). Online teaching at its best: Merging instructional design with teaching and learning research (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
Purper, C., Bowden, A. G., Guignard, J., Farris, S., Hovey, M., & Crist, M. (2020). Faith Integration in the Higher Education Online Classroom: Perspectives and Practice. International Christian Community of Teacher Educators Journal, 15(1).
Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L.-A., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 183-204. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Schroering, A. (2022). Writing as a team sport: Cultivating community in the online writing classroom. In L. Gray-Rosendale & S. Rosendale (Eds.), Go online! Reconfiguring writing courses for the new, virtual world (pp. 71-83). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Smith, T. W., & Maiden, E. I. (2015). Cultivating community in online and blended learning environments. In J. Keengwe & J. J. Agamba (Eds.), Models for improving and optimizing online and blended learning in higher education (pp. 83-105). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.
Strydom, F. (2020). Student engagement: A key to success. In F. Strydom, G. Kuh, & S. Loots (Eds.), Engaging students: Using evidence to promote student success (pp. 1-21). Bloemfontein, South Africa: Sun Media Bloemfontein.
Vincent, P. J. (2023). Ecology of faith and learning: A case study of the experience of spiritual formation of online undergraduate students. [PhD Dissertation Submitted to Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA, USA].
Xiao, Y., Liu, X., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Disentangling the mechanism of student engagement in online language classrooms from the perspective of Community of Inquiry. Heliyon, 10, e31934.
Yang, C. (2025). Research on the theoretical framework of student engagement in blended learning mode. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 59, 102-109.
Yu, Z., & Li, M. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of Community of Inquiry in online learning contexts over twenty-five years. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 11669-11688. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11081-w
Zain, F. M., & Sailin, S. N. (2020). Students' experience with flipped learning approach in higher education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(19), 4946-4958. doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.081067
Zepke, N. (2017). Student engagement in neoliberal times: Theories and practices for learning and teaching in higher education. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ruth M. Oyeniyi, Olakunle Babafemi Ayeni (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY 4.0 deed)