ASSESSING THE INFLUENCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON PASTORAL MINISTRY AND MINISTERIAL PROFESSIONALISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21922996Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Pastoral Ministry, Ministerial Professionalism, Ministerial Leadership, Technology Acceptance Model, Church AdministrationAbstract
The technological era, which has led to the emergence of Artificial Intelligence, has brought a significant shift to contemporary society. AI has altered numerous operations and activities, and its influence is being felt across sectors such as business, governance, education, healthcare, and religion. Recently, pastoral ministry has witnessed an increase in the deployment of AI tools for some pastoral responsibilities once traditionally carried out directly by pastors, such as administrative management, pastoral communication, sermon preparation, digital evangelism, discipleship, and leadership development. Admittedly, the rapid adoption of AI tools offers opportunities to enhance ministerial effectiveness and professional competence. It must, however, be noted that they also raise critical concerns regarding pastoral authenticity, ethical responsibility, ministerial presence, and professional integrity. The research employs a descriptive method, and the study primarily anchors on the Technological Acceptance Model (TAM), with brief support from the Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DIT) and Osmer’s Practical Theory. The study argues that AI’s contributions to administrative efficiency, leadership effectiveness, knowledge acquisition, and ministry outreach are significant. However, overdependence on this technological tool presents some ministerial and professional concerns. The study submits that AI should be viewed as a complementary tool that enhances pastoral leadership and ministerial responsibilities rather than replacing them. It recommends developing theological and ethical guidelines for AI integration, providing AI literacy training for clergy, and incorporating emerging technologies into ministerial formation programmes.
References
Abioye, S.O. (2025) “Challenge and Solution to the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Christian Leadership and Administration.” World Journal of Innovation and Technology. 9. (6)
Banks, R. (2013). Reenvisioning Theological Education: Exploring a Missional Alternative to Current Models. William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Cheong, P. H., & Liu, L. (2025). Faithful Innovation: Negotiating Institutional Logics for AI. Religions, 16 (3).
Campbell, H. A. (2021). Digital Creatives and the Rethinking of Religious Authority. Routledge.
Campbell, J.P., Mathenge, C., Cherwek, H., Balaskas, K., Pasquale, L.R., Keane, P.A., & Chiang, M.F. (2021). “Artificial Intelligence to Reduce Ocular Health Disparities: Moving from Concept to Implementation.” Translation Vision Science and Technology. 10 (3).
Conrad, P.G (2025). Opportunities and Threats of Artificial Intelligence in Christian Ministry: An Interdisciplinary Approach through the Lens of Science and Technology. 16 (9).
Davis, F.D (1989). “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of use, and User acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly. 13. (3).
Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., López de Prado, M., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2023). “Connecting the dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation.” Information Fusion, 99, 101896
El Malouf, N. and Bahemia,H. (2026). Diffusion of Innovations: A Review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed), TheoryHub Book. https://open.ncl.nd,uk/ISBN: 9781739604400
Floridi, L. (2023). “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Principles, Challenges and Opportunities.” Oxford University Press.
Gabriel, I. et al. (2024). “The Ethics of Advanced Assistants.” arXiv. Preprint arXiv:2404.16244
Herzfeld, N. (2002). In Our Image: Artificial Intelligence and the Human Spirit. Fortress Press
Jobin, A., Ienca., & Vavena, E. (2019). “Artificial Intelligence: The Global Landscape of Ethics Guidelines” Nature Machine Intelligence. 1 (9).
Mohammed, Ziyad. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence Definition, Ethics and Standards” in the British University in Egypt. Retrieved from https:// www. Researchgate. Net. Accessed on 29/09/2023
Nord, I. & Schleier, L. (2025). “A Lack of Agency: Artificial Intelligence has so far Shown Little Potential for Church Innovation: An Expository Interview Study with Protestant and Catholic Leaders in Germany” Religions. 16. (7).
Oluwarinde, O.E., Olulowo, S.A., and Kuforiji, A.A. (2025). “Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Evangelistic Education in the 21st Century” The Pastoral Counsellors: Journal of Nigerian Association of Pastoral Counsellors in Collaboration with the Department of Religious Studies and Department of Guidance and Counselling. 4
Osmer, Richard R. 2008 Practical Theology: An Introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing,
Peterson, E.H. (1987). Working the Angles: The Shape of Pastoral Integrity. Eerdmans
Proudfoot, A. (2023). “Could a Conscious Machine Deliver Pastoral Care?” Studies in Christian Ethics. 36.(3)
Przygoda, W., Rynio, A., and Kalisz. M. (2025). “Artificial Intelligence: A New Challenge for Human Understanding, Christian Education, and the Pastoral Activity of the Churches” Religions. 16
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press
Russell S., and Norvig, P. (2021), Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th Ed). Pearson.
Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
Singler, B. (2020). “Religion and Artificial Intelligence: An overview.” Religion Compass. 14 (8)
Stoddart, E. (2023). “Artificial Pastoral Care: Abdication, Delegation or Collaboration?” Studies in Christian Ethics. 36.(3).
Swinton, J. (2017). Becoming Friends of Time: Disability, Timefulness and Gentle Discipleship. Baylor University Press.
Tiwari, S. P. (2022). “Organisational Competitiveness and Digital Governance Challenges.” Archives of Business Research, 10. (3)
Turkle. S. (2017). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Books.
Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D (2000). “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: For Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Sciences. 46. (2)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sunday Adeyemo. ADEPOJU, PhD (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY 4.0 deed)
